The decay of English--blamed on bloggers!
Apr. 24th, 2009 06:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My work's office newsletter pulled up this tidbit from the 1 May 2006 edition of the Guardian: Internet culture spells doom for strait-laced orthographers
The Oxford English Corpus has found that "dozens of traditional phrases are now more commonly misspelled than rendered correctly in written English [on the internet]." Looking through the list, I find to my shame I am guilty of some of these infractions myself.
But I remain philosophical about it, as English is a living language that will keep evolving and changing for many decades to come. I only really rankle at manglings of English that don't make sense, like the greengrocer's apostrophe. I'm seeing more and more incorrect English creep into newspapers (who needs proofreaders when you have computers?) and while it annoys me it's important that I remind myself that
The Oxford English Corpus has found that "dozens of traditional phrases are now more commonly misspelled than rendered correctly in written English [on the internet]." Looking through the list, I find to my shame I am guilty of some of these infractions myself.
But I remain philosophical about it, as English is a living language that will keep evolving and changing for many decades to come. I only really rankle at manglings of English that don't make sense, like the greengrocer's apostrophe. I'm seeing more and more incorrect English creep into newspapers (who needs proofreaders when you have computers?) and while it annoys me it's important that I remind myself that
I
am rapidly becoming the one guilty of misusing English, because I'm not keeping up with changes through common usage.
ferrets' meeps
Date: 2009-04-24 09:05 am (UTC)http://ferretronix.com/interviewing_tips.html
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 02:18 pm (UTC)Actually, they called attention to that themselves. Believe it or not, "strait-laced" is now the standard way of spelling it, and "straight-laced" is the variant (not wrong, just an alternative). Historically, you'd be 100% correct, but this is an example of how language
degradesevolves. Online discourse is only speeding the process up.http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/corpus-2/
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 12:25 pm (UTC)I've been spelling it just desserts for years. Then again, I always took the meaning to be something a person would have to eat, much like crow or humble pie.
My guess is while a few of those aren't in the Oxford dictionary, others may have the allegedly incorrect spellings. I should check some of them out in Merriam-Webster.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-25 03:00 am (UTC)When I went to school the always used to say spell it as it sounds.
Well then how do you spell Phantom, if you were to spell it as it sounds the it would be Fantom and that's wrong of course.
Spelling in school's now is not considered as important as it used to be, now they tend not to correct spelling mistakes as long as the word sounds right even if its spelled wrong.
This means when young people write there resume to get a job it can be very hard to read